|
From: | Thomas Wolff |
Subject: | Re: 1.7] BUG - GREP slows to a crawl with large number of matches on a single file |
Date: | Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:39:46 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 6 16:00, Thomas Wolff wrote:...I extended your test program to demonstrate the inefficiency of the standard mbrtowc function. [...]
I later had to correct:
Anyway, corrected results are still by a factor of 3 to 4 in favor of my algorithm.
Corinna wrote:
That's sort of an unfair test. Your utftouni function doesn't care for mbstate, error, and surrogate pair handling.
This is a question of use cases:* mbstate is needed e.g. if you feed results of read() which possibly come in arbitrary chunks directly into mbtowc(); it's not needed if you only transform complete lines of text at once. The stdlib function is a little bit too generic (and thus complicated, too) for many applications. * error handling is there, in my function; it's simplified, incorrect sequences are all mapped to 0 for the test case but they could as well return an error indication without performance impact. * surrogate pair handling is only needed if you pass the string from/to the Windows API. It's not needed for POSIX applications (provided wchar_t would be sufficiently wide). So if wchar_t can be extended in the newlib API, it might be useful to have two implementations; one for applications (w/o surrogates), one for cygwin itself.
[...]My main point was that, depending on the use case, some applications would be better off using less generic, optimized functions. The kind of dogmatic suggestion (as seen in the "locale scene") that everybody should use the stdlib wide character functions is often misleading.
grep and sed would certainly be well advised to change that. Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |