|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/16] my last hefty patch drop |
Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:37:07 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 03/13/2010 09:45 PM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> One solution to make this patch palatable to gawk would be to add > more "feature bits" to dfasyntax, that specify whether dfaexec can > make some assumptions about the input.I think this is the way to go. It sounds reasonable to me. I don't mind adding in a few more bits.
I fixed it in the next version; for now it's #ifn?def GREP instead of an additional bit.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |