Re: dfa.c fix for C89 compilers

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 03/31/2010 05:19 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> The point about C89's age is
> irrelevant; what is important is how well and widely C99 is
> implemented, which, to put it mildly, depends on your perspective.
> (Even GCC doesn't fully implement it, though thankfully the holes are
> now pretty small and esoteric.) Making a program require C99,
> therefore, relegates it to mainstream, modern systems.

For this particular feature, the "flag date" is June 18, 2001 (when GCC 
3.0 was released).  It's still almost 9 years old.

Are there any serious porting targets that do not support GCC 3.0?

Paolo