[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RRI - copyright assignment mailed in
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: RRI - copyright assignment mailed in |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:47:57 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 |
Hi Paolo.
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:39:21 +0200
> From: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> To: Aharon Robbins <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, bug-gnulib <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: RRI - copyright assignment mailed in
>
> Il 26/04/2012 22:40, Aharon Robbins ha scritto:
> > Hi Jim, Paul, Paolo, anyone else I missed,
> >
> > I sent in paperwork for copyright assignments in grep and gnulib to the
> > FSF; they were mailed last Friday so they should be there by now.
> >
> > Can we move ahead getting the Rational Range Interpretation patches
> > integrated?
> >
> > I expect that they would drop in easily.
>
> Can you please send pointers to the latest version?
What I sent to the list a while back should do. If not, I will recreate
the patches but I can't promise they'll 100% follow Jim's standards.
> I will once more write down my requirements for the patches to go in:
>
> 1) For regex, the patches should only touch !_LIBC sections of the code,
> so that they can be included in glibc too from the beginning;
I believe this is the case already.
> 2) Later we can discuss affecting also the _LIBC sections of the code,
> including fnmatch. Until then, the patches should not affect the
> autoconf test for --with/without-included-regex.
How do I check this? I am not sure this is a reasonable requirement,
since this patch purposely changes the behavior against glibc.
I will submit the diffs one more time but after that I give up.
As a separate question, there are some bugs in glibc regex that I
have fixed and would like to submit patches for. Can I send them to
you offline?
Thanks,
Arnold