[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #61919] wrong(?) hyphenation (word division) of "material" (for "FO
From: |
Dave |
Subject: |
[bug #61919] wrong(?) hyphenation (word division) of "material" (for "FOR-RELEASE")) |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:40:39 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #61919 (project groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> Not only is the subject of this ticket subsumed by existing
> bug #57594,
Hmm, the last sentence of the original submission is subsumed by #57594, but
it's not clear the rest is. Though maybe we have different perspectives on
what constitutes "the rest":
> but the exact issue, down to the very word, that Bjarni
> raises was addressed in a commit message and ChangeLog entry.
The issue was certainly _mentioned_ in the commit message. But that the
original Knuth hyphenation patterns gave results for "material" (and other
words) that agreed with the dictionary, and that the current Knuth+Kuiken ones
violate the typical dictionary hyphenation for "material" (and other words,
some far more egregiously), remains unaddressed.
This is a much larger issue than the single word Bjarni highlighted, but that
word is symptomatic of a legitimate problem that warrants some discussion
amongst a larger audience. (Yes, yes, I need to revisit and finish that email
draft.)
But just as a sanity check: do you see any of the divisions under the NEW
column as improvements over their OLD brethren?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61919>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/