bug-groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #62617] doc/groff.texi: clarify relationship between type size and


From: Dave
Subject: [bug #62617] doc/groff.texi: clarify relationship between type size and vertical spacing
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 19:45:18 -0400 (EDT)

URL:
  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62617>

                 Summary: doc/groff.texi: clarify relationship between type
size and vertical spacing
                 Project: GNU troff
               Submitter: barx
               Submitted: Sat 11 Jun 2022 06:45:16 PM CDT
                Category: Core
                Severity: 2 - Minor
              Item Group: Documentation
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None


    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11 Jun 2022 06:45:16 PM CDT By: Dave <barx>
(This was briefly discussed in email
(http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2022-04/msg00001.html) but appears to have
fallen through the cracks.  That thread has more detail and discussion.)

This is a request to tweak wording that commit 52604fdd
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=52604fdd> modified to
say: "In ordinary circumstances, this quantity is 120% of the type size."

This is the _typographic_ convention.  But nothing in groff makes this 120%
"ordinary": the user must explicitly specify a .vs value that is 120% of her
.ps value in order to make this true.  One alternate way to phrase this could
be, "Traditionally, typesetters have set this quantity to 120% of the type
size."







    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62617>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]