[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #64548] [refer] want new fields: %e, %s, %c, %o, %a, %u
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
[bug #64548] [refer] want new fields: %e, %s, %c, %o, %a, %u |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Aug 2023 02:56:05 -0400 (EDT) |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64548>
Summary: [refer] want new fields: %e, %s, %c, %o, %a, %u
Group: GNU roff
Submitter: gbranden
Submitted: Sat 12 Aug 2023 06:56:03 AM UTC
Category: Preprocessor refer
Severity: 1 - Wish
Item Group: Feature change
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Planned Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 12 Aug 2023 06:56:03 AM UTC By: G. Branden Robinson <gbranden>
Peter Schaffter suggested
[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2021-08/msg00019.html a couple of
years ago]:
... I proposed %e as a candidate for the edition field
because it's been around long enough in mom that it makes sense for
other macro packages to follow suit. Plus it has the advantage of
being a meaningful [mnemonic].
Mom implements five additional fields
for Internet sources as required by MLA:
%s site name
%c content (e.g. Web, Email, Blog...).
%o organization, group, or sponsor or the site
%a access date
%u URL
Methinks, in 2021, that the other groff macro packages should catch
up with this newfangled Internet thingy.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64548>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #64548] [refer] want new fields: %e, %s, %c, %o, %a, %u,
G. Branden Robinson <=