[bug #64639] [mom] odd output with #64421 reproducer

[G. Branden Robinson]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64639 (project groff):

Aha, that makes sense.  Once again my guess at how _mom_ works was all wrong. 
:-O

I should have known, because the `COLOR` macro's definition has been stable
for something like 20 years.  If it was as griefed as my hypothesis had it,
many people would have noticed.

Nevertheless Bjarni seems to have found a footgun.  (Perhaps he has a big
gun...or big feet.)

Could we use more input validation in `DRH`?


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64639>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/