[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: providing iso images
From: |
Thierry Laronde |
Subject: |
Re: providing iso images |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:25:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 04:42:43PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> At Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:21:33 +0100,
> Thierry Laronde wrote:
> > > Do you have an idea if your patch will be applied to the official tree?
> >
> > No. The decision belongs to the official maintainers.
>
> If you have written the patch at an earlier stage (i.e. when GRUB was
> a boot loader only for maniacs like me), I would be glad to apply it
> as soon as possible. But I hesitate to do that, because it has a
> substantial change on the bootstrap and the low-level disk I/O
> system. So I'd like to leave it alone, until we release the next
> version 0.91.
>
> I must admit that the reason why 0.91 doesn't appear yet is that I
> didn't devote my spare time to GRUB so much... But I also had other
> things I wished to do. Anyway, I'll come back to the development
> seriously sooner or later.
This is our common "doom": I also work on something else at the moment,
even if there are several things I'd like to do with/for GRUB ;)
>
> BTW, do you know how stable your patch is at the moment?
At the moment, everything seems to work OK for people who have tried it,
but I have been a bit disappointed to see that the courageous were only
10 or less... To have a major chance to get feedback the patch needs to
be integrated to the CVS. Could we have two branches, one stable and one
unstable?
BTW, _in theory_, everything working till now should work as well, but
this version adds new possibilities.
Cheers,
--
Thierry Laronde (Alceste) <address@hidden>
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C