[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for UFS2
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for UFS2 |
Date: |
Sat, 1 May 2004 15:06:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
On Friday 30 April 2004 15:29, Robert Millan wrote:
> Then we want to have a [grub]/stage2/README file explaning that?
I don't think we need it, because the comment in the file says necessary
information.
> Another minor question is the order in which we should list
> filesystems in the Makefiles and other preprocessor structures in the
> source files. Should UFS2 be always after FFS? Should it be always as
> the last FS ID that could be allocated (this would be 10, after
> ISOFS)?
I guess the order is not very important in this case.
Okuji
- Re: Patch for UFS2,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=