[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16
From: |
Heiko Bauke |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16 |
Date: |
Thu, 30 May 2013 21:12:18 +0200 |
Hi,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:11:16 -0600
Patrick Alken <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have uploaded a test release for gsl 1.16 here:
>
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz.sig
>
> All reports are welcome - anyone who can test on various platforms
> would be appreciated (BSD, Mac OS, Windows).
>
> Please try testing the build and also the documentation (I upgraded
> the texinfo.tex file in doc/ so I want to make sure that works with
> everyone's configuration)
>
> 1) ./configure ; make ; make check
> 2) cd doc ; make ps
>
> Report any successes/failures to address@hidden
>
>
compiling on Ubuntu 12.04 using gcc 4.8 with
CC=gcc-4.8 CFLAGS="-Wpedantic -Wextra -Wall" ./configure
I get a lot of warnings. Most of them might be harmless. Others may
hint to actual errors. For example (plus -Werror)
memcpy.c: In function ‘memcpy’:
memcpy.c:13:19: error: argument ‘len’ doesn’t match built-in prototype
[-Werror] unsigned int len;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Do you think it is (still) a good idea to provide an own memcpy
function coded in K&R C?
»make check« does not detect any errors.
Heiko
--
-- Number Crunch Blog @ http://numbercrunch.de
-- Cluster Computing @ http://www.clustercomputing.de
-- Heiko Bauke @ http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/bauke