bug-guile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#39634: All keyowrds hash to the same value


From: Andy Wingo
Subject: bug#39634: All keyowrds hash to the same value
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:56:56 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)

On Thu 20 Feb 2020 17:19, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> Of all the scm_tc7_ values listed in ‘scm.h’, the following are not
> explicitly listed (so they go to the default case that hashes the first
> word):

Reformatting your list so I can check one by one :)

>   variable,
>   hashtable,
>   fluid,
>   dynamic_state,
>   frame,
>   atomic_box,
>   program,
>   vm_cont,
>   weak_set,
>   weak_table,
>   port

No equal? implementation, so should hashq() instead.

>   bytevector,
>   array,
>   bitvector,

These have equal? implementations, and what's more, a bitvector can
equal? an array... I think we have another bug!

  ;; Project 2d array as 1d array (scm_tc7_array)
  (define x
    (make-shared-array #2b((#t #t #t)) (lambda (i) (list 0 i)) '(0 2)))
  ;; scm_tc7_bitvector
  (define y #*111)

  (equal? x y) ;; => #t
  (equal? (hash x #xffffffff) (hash y #xffffffff)) ;; => #f
            
Similarly for 1-d scm_tc7_array versus regular vectors, bytevectors,
etc.

Fixing this will not be straightforward...  I think basically 1d arrays
need some special hashing logic so that e.g. vectors and 1d arrays hash
to the same thing.

>   stringbuf,
>   values,

These are never exposed to Scheme, and never compared using equal?
AFAIU.  No need for special cases.

Basically I think the tc7 case should default to hashq, and include
special cases for the ones that have equal? implementations or which
have read syntax.

Sound right to you?

Andy





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]