[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#72378: srfi-64: top-level test-group does not work
From: |
Taylan Kammer |
Subject: |
bug#72378: srfi-64: top-level test-group does not work |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 00:25:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The test-group is defined as equivalent to:
>
> (if (not (test-to-skip% suite-name))
> (dynamic-wind
> (lambda () (test-begin suite-name))
> (lambda () decl-or-expr ...)
> (lambda () (test-end suite-name))))
>
> `test-to-skip%' is not defined anywhere (great), however in the text we have
> this sentence:
>
>> However, the entire group is skipped if it matched an active test-skip
> Since active skip list is mandated to be a property of test runner, in case
> the
> test runner does not exist yet, there cannot be active skip list. Hence the
> group should run. However:
>
> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
> (test-group "x"
> #t)
>
> Leads to:
>
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1752:10 6 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
> In unknown file:
> 5 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7fc490169300>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 724:2 4 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handler (k
> proc)>)
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 619:8 3 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fc49016cc80>)))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2836:4 2 (save-module-excursion _)
> 4388:12 1 (_)
> In
> /home/wolf/src/guile-wolfsden/tests/srfi-64/test-group-top-level.srfi64test:
> 8:0 0 (_)
>
>
> /home/wolf/src/guile-wolfsden/tests/srfi-64/test-group-top-level.srfi64test:8:0:
> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting
> struct): #f
>
> Have a nice day
> Tomas Volf
>
>
I don't know how to fix this in the reference implementation that Guile uses,
and don't care to find out because (as you seem to have noticed) the
implementation is somewhat over-complicated in many parts.
But in any case, my implementation isn't affected by this bug, and your example
works as intended with it.
- Taylan
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#72378: srfi-64: top-level test-group does not work,
Taylan Kammer <=