[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22831: [PATCH 2/2] WIP: gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references fo
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#22831: [PATCH 2/2] WIP: gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for openssl. |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Mar 2016 21:59:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:42:41AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:46:26PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> >> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
>> >>
>> >> > From 00807e4421757f8d9204f1601de9a8286a408f91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> > From: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
>> >> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:24:20 -0500
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for openssl.
>> >> >
>> >> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl)[arguments]: Add #:allowed-references.
>> >>
>> >> For some reason I hadn’t seen it in M-x debbugs-gnu for this report
>> >> today, but the patch looks good to me!
>> >>
>> >> If we apply it now, it won’t trigger a rebuild (yay!), but will still
>> >> trigger a bunch of regrafting, which is slightly annoying. What about
>> >> applying it in the next ‘security-updates’ branch?
>> >
>> > Sure. Is it okay if I create that branch?
>>
>> Sure, no problem.
>
> Since there was already a security-updates job started, how about
> putting on core-updates?
Dunno, what does Mark think? Let’s check with Mark on IRC. :-)
Ludo’.