[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:26:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> skribis:
> 11:56:03 address@hidden:~/src/guix-master
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix graph --type=bag -e '(begin (use-modules (guix
> packages)) (@@ (gnu packages pawei) gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs))' | wc -l
> 14
> 11:56:22 address@hidden:~/src/guix-master
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix graph --type=bag -e '(begin (use-modules (guix
> packages)) (@@ (gnu packages pawei) gnu-make-explicit-inputs))' | wc -l
> 79
[...]
> (define gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs
> (package-with-bootstrap-guile
> (package (inherit gnu-make)
> (name "make-no-implicit-inputs")
> (inputs (%bootstrap-inputs+toolchain))
> (native-inputs '())
> (arguments `(#:guile ,%bootstrap-guile
> #:implicit-inputs? #f
> ,@(package-arguments diffutils))))))
>
> (define gnu-make-explicit-inputs
> (let ((p (package-with-explicit-inputs gnu-make
> (%bootstrap-inputs+toolchain)
> #:guile %bootstrap-guile)))
> (package-with-bootstrap-guile
> (package (inherit p)
> (name "make-explicit-inputs")
> (arguments (package-arguments p))))))
The difference comes from the fact that ‘gnu-make-explicit-inputs’ has
Guile in its ‘inputs’:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-direct-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs)
$5 = (("libc" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3d216c0>)
("gcc" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3d21600>)
("binutils" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150 3d21540>)
("coreutils&co" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150
3d21480>) ("bash" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150
3d21480>) ("guile" #<package address@hidden gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150
3d213c0>))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This comes from the fact that the ‘inputs’ field is not overridden,
unlike in the case of ‘gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs’.
To solve this, the solution is to add this one ‘inputs’ line:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define gnu-make-explicit-inputs
(let ((p (package-with-explicit-inputs gnu-make
(%bootstrap-inputs+toolchain)
#:guile %bootstrap-guile)))
(package-with-bootstrap-guile
(package (inherit p)
(name "make-explicit-inputs")
(inputs '()) ;<- HERE
(arguments (package-arguments p))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Perhaps you hit similar cases on ‘wip-bootstrap’? It’s easy to leave
out too many inputs…
Cheers,
Ludo’.