[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:24:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
> It'd be nice to have an importer. Maybe we can use Nix's work to
> reduce the amount of investigation needed to get there.
Absolutely. ASDF is good enough that the vast majority of CL libraries can be
packaged without an itch.
If we could use Quicklisp or
http://quickdocs.org/
to write a recursive importer, we could get programs like Next browser packaged
in one go but for a couple of tweaks for the 2-3 odd packages.
Let me know if you want to work on this, otherwise I'll give it a shot.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/01
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/02
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/04
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/04
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/10