[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2018 20:08:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Hi,
>> Adding to *foreign-library-directories* at compile time may allow a
>> package to compile, but I get the feeling that it may not have the
>> desired effect when you try to load the package later on.
>
> Why? In my experience it works for a compiled Next executable.
>
>> I guess another approach we could take if replacement is undesirable
>> would be to modify the cffi package to honour some environment variable
>> for its default, and then add that variable to the search path for
>> cffi.
>
> The cffi:*foreign-library-directories* approach got recommended to me on
> the CFFI mailing list. I find it similar to what you want, a sort of
> environment variable (a search-path global variable). I haven't looked
> into Nix.
>
>> I personally tend to favour replacement, but others could chime in here
>> as well since this problem isn't specific to lisp packaging.
We usually replace plain references to libraries with exact store paths.
> Could this be automated? What I like with cffi:*foreign-library-directories*
> is
> that we could automatically push
>
> (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "foo") "/lib)
>
> to it so that packages only have to write something like
>
> #:cffi-packages (list ,cl-sqlite ,cl-foo...)
This sounds useful, but to me it feels like wrapping executables in
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which we try hard to avoid.
When using cffi:*foreign-library-directories* how would we deal with
cases where we have more than one package specifying cffi-packages?
Would this option need to be considered for every package in the package
closure? Would it need to be handled by a profile hook in case these
packages are installed?
--
Ricardo
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, (continued)
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/03
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/04
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/04
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/05
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Andy Patterson, 2018/10/10
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/10/04