bug#33082: guix pull resulted in an error: compute-guix-derivation

[Gábor Boskovits]

Hello Joshua,

Joshua Branson <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt.
30., K, 16:10):
>
> Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hello Joshua,
> >
> > Joshua Branson <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt.
> > 30., K, 13:44):
> >>
> >> Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > Joshua Branson <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 29., H 
> >> > 15:54):
> >> >
> >> >  address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> >> >
> >> >  > Hello,
> >> >  >
> >> >
> >> >  I was able to update successfully.  This bug seems like a duplicate of
> >> >  python 2 not deterministic.  Someone ought to close this bug report.
> >> >
> >> > I believe this is not the case, usually non deterministic means the 
> >> > build is not reproducible, while this is a
> >> > non-deterministic test failure. I would suggest
> >> > keeping this bug open, if I am right, maybe renaming to 
> >> > non-deterministic test failure in python2. What do you think?
> >>
> >> Fair enough.  Since I made the bug report, then I should try to build it
> >> again and see what happens.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for having a look, please make sure to use guix build -K, so
> > that the failed build results are retained.
> > If you can't trigger the failure, then I will try to do this later.
>
> I was able to build this successfully:
>
> guix build -K /gnu/store/qpvqn6ff2lmfq74ff3i9pz5hrb01p9hw-python2-2.7.14.drv
>
>
> Collecting setuptools
> Collecting pip
> Installing collected packages: setuptools, pip
> Successfully installed pip-9.0.1 setuptools-28.8.0
> phase `install' succeeded after 32.6 seconds
> starting phase `move-tk-inter'
> phase `move-tk-inter' succeeded after 0.2 seconds
> starting phase `remove-tests'
> phase `remove-tests' succeeded after 0.8 seconds
> starting phase `patch-shebangs'
> phase `patch-shebangs' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `make-libraries-writable'
> phase `make-libraries-writable' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
> starting phase `strip'
> stripping binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14/lib" with "strip" 
> and flags ("--strip-debug" "--enable-deterministic-archives")
> stripping binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14/bin" with "strip" 
> and flags ("--strip-debug" "--enable-deterministic-archives")
> stripping binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/z0r8jiimjgdg2sl3h9ad9z1v1i95752v-python2-2.7.14-tk/lib" with 
> "strip" and flags ("--strip-debug" "--enable-deterministic-archives")
> phase `strip' succeeded after 2.9 seconds
> starting phase `validate-runpath'
> validating RUNPATH of 64 binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14/lib"...
> validating RUNPATH of 1 binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14/bin"...
> validating RUNPATH of 1 binaries in 
> "/gnu/store/z0r8jiimjgdg2sl3h9ad9z1v1i95752v-python2-2.7.14-tk/lib"...
> phase `validate-runpath' succeeded after 1.1 seconds
> starting phase `validate-documentation-location'
> phase `validate-documentation-location' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `delete-info-dir-file'
> phase `delete-info-dir-file' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `patch-dot-desktop-files'
> phase `patch-dot-desktop-files' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `install-license-files'
> installing 1 license files
> phase `install-license-files' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `reset-gzip-timestamps'
> phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
> starting phase `compress-documentation'
> compressing documentation in 
> '/gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14/share/man' with 
> "gzip" and flags ("--best" "--no-name")
> phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
> successfully built 
> /gnu/store/qpvqn6ff2lmfq74ff3i9pz5hrb01p9hw-python2-2.7.14.drv
> /gnu/store/l7164sj4k77c4bwy9mrqq9d96bxiz4kw-python2-2.7.14
> /gnu/store/z0r8jiimjgdg2sl3h9ad9z1v1i95752v-python2-2.7.14-tk
>
>
> I suppose now we can close this bug report, since I can't reproduce the
> error?
>

Please leave this open, until I can have a closer look. I will take
ownership of this bug.

> Thanks
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > g_bor
>
>
>

Best regards,
g_bor