[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly
From: |
Diego Nicola Barbato |
Subject: |
bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:36:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>>> Hello Guix,
>>>
>>> The first time a user runs ‘guix pull’ after a fresh install it does not
>>> seem to update guix. ‘guix --version’ reports that guix is still
>>> version 0.15.0 after running ‘guix pull’, instead of showing the hash of
>>> the latest commit.
>>
>> “guix pull” should have reminded you to add ~/.config/guix/current/bin
>> to the front of your PATH environment variable. When you do that you
>> will be using the new version of Guix.
I forgot to mention that this is on GuixSD, where
~/.config/guix/currend/bin is already in PATH, which maybe explains why
I did not get a reminder.
> In addition, be aware that Bash maintains a cache of commands it looked
> up in $PATH. Thus it may be that, say, it had cached that ‘guix’ is
> really /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix. When you pulled, it didn’t
> invalidate its cache thus you kept using that old version.
>
> The solution is to run “hash guix” at the Bash prompt to force cache
> invalidation (info "(bash) Bourne Shell Builtins").
I believe this is it. This also explains why ‘which guix’ returned the
updated guix while ‘guix --version’ claimed it was still the older
version, which I found rather confusing.
I am afraid being unaware of this has led me to inadvertently downgrade
GuixSD whenever I reconfigured for the first time after a fresh install.
Thanks!
Diego
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Diego Nicola Barbato, 2018/12/06
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/06
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Diego Nicola Barbato, 2018/12/06
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/06
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly,
Diego Nicola Barbato <=
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Björn Höfling, 2018/12/07
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/07
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Diego Nicola Barbato, 2018/12/19
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, swedebugia, 2018/12/19
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/12/19
- bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly, swedebugia, 2018/12/20