bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible

[Guillaume Le Vaillant]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote:
>> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package ’sbcl’ seems not-reproducible.
>
> [...]
>
>> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
>> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...
>
> Any news from upstream?  Still unreproducible for me.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon

So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp,
so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL.
A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know
nobody has worked on it yet.

[2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature