[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MIG->Corba
|
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: MIG->Corba |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:47:38 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.1.4i |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:15:59PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> So, you're saying that a well optimized ORB can be just as good as MIG.
> That raises two other questions:
> 1) Is CORBA going to be as slow as MIG?
> 2) Is MIG slow enough?
Performance is not really the concern here, although it is good to know that
a CORBA implementation can make special short cuts on the Hurd.
MiG falls short in several ways, and something better is desired, either by
extension or by replacement. If something generally accepted like CORBA can
be it, even better.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
- Re: MIG->Corba, (continued)
Re: MIG->Corba, Igor Khavkine, 2001/02/08
Re: MIG->Corba, Joshua Rosen, 2001/02/08
Re: MIG->Corba, Brian May, 2001/02/08
Re: MIG->Corba,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Ingmar Schuster, 2001/02/09
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/02/09
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/02/09
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Ognyan Kulev, 2001/02/10
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), exa, 2001/02/10
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Ognyan Kulev, 2001/02/10
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Eray Ozkural (exa), 2001/02/13
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Johan Rydberg, 2001/02/19
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Eray Ozkural, 2001/02/19
Re: MIG->Corba (performance), Mridul Jain, 2001/02/11