[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs! |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:34:45 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 04:49:17PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > That's fine by me if it's tested. BTW add -p to your diff switches.
>
> Actually, I goofed up. The arguments to the reply stub have not been
> changed by my patch. In fact, as we now copy the user data all the time, a
> seperate reply stub is not necessary anymore! There is also a bug
> somewhere.
>
> I will work out something better.
I didn't look closely, but now I am thinking twice. If the data is small
enough to fit inline, and you use a separate reply stub, then you can send
it without copying. That ought to be the common case.
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/01
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/10
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/11
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Roland McGrath, 2001/07/11
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/12
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/12
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!,
Roland McGrath <=
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/12
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function, more bugs!, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/12