[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect()
From: |
Igor Khavkine |
Subject: |
Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect() |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:07:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:56:07PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 02:32:03PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> > Turns out the upstream maintainer of the tulip driver is very efficient.
> > The official version of the driver already contains a fix for this bug.
>
> What about the version in gnumach?
Good point. The one in gnumach seems to be from linux-2.2.17, which
is even older then the one I had problems with. The official website
says that the driver should be compatible with linux kernels from 1.2.0
to 2.2.x. So even if gnumach pretends to be a 2.0.x kernel, you shouldn't
have any problems replaceing that driver with the newer version.
But you should definitely update it.
Igor
- oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Igor Khavkine, 2001/07/23
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Roland McGrath, 2001/07/23
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Igor Khavkine, 2001/07/24
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Roland McGrath, 2001/07/24
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Igor Khavkine, 2001/07/30
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Roland McGrath, 2001/07/30
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Igor Khavkine, 2001/07/30
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/30
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(),
Igor Khavkine <=
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/30
- Re: oskit-mach bug, panic in consider_lmm_collect(), Roland McGrath, 2001/07/30