[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?
From: |
Farid Hajji |
Subject: |
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different? |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:03:11 +0100 (CET) |
> > Network-wide unique identifiers like task-IDs, ports, etc... are a nice
> > thing to have. One idea may be to organize all nodes of a collective
> > in a distributed kind of (hurdisch) filesystem. IDs would then be
> > simple paths and could be located with some kind of distributed
> > lookup() functionality:
>
> It was always my plan to have a single IP address for a collective.
> (The collective might use IP for communication between its component
> systems, but those addresses would be entirely internal.)
You certainly want to assign a multicast IP address to the collective,
right?
-Farid.
--
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
One OS To Rule Them All And In The Darkness Bind Them... --Bill Gates.
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?,
Farid Hajji <=
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/07
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/07
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Eray Ozkural (exa), 2002/01/09
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/23