[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results |
Date: |
24 Feb 2002 11:46:16 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> writes:
> I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to
> be gnumach 2.0.
For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's
really a sort of one-shot switch. Once we switch, we blow away the
old gnumach, and we're switched, with whatever bugs that entails.
(Well, we might choose to do parallel releases like Linux, but I
really think that's more effort than it's worth for us, at this
point.)
> Having the same ABI for GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd would be nice,
> especially for the Debian project. A lot of the linux-* binaries could
> be the same as the hurd-* binaries. This is certainly appreciated with
> a hurd-powerpc port underway. ;-)
This is definitely true, and it's a long-term goal, but not a
short-term one.
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/02/23
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/02/24
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/02/24
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Roland McGrath, 2002/02/24
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/02/24
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Roland McGrath, 2002/02/24
- Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/02/24