[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic) |
Date: |
03 Mar 2002 14:25:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Jon Arney <jarney1@cox.net> writes:
> As I said, I am not opposed to using syslogd and think starting there
> is a good idea. If you believe it is feasible without causing
> recursive RPC calls, I'll believe you. My only concern was that
> if, say, 'pfinet' needed to log something and syslog were configured
> to write to UDP ports, pfinet would have to write to a UDP port
> causing perhaps a recursive loop of log calls. I realize that this
> is ultimately a pathological case, but it's worth considering.
Of course, but the right thing to do is to just have syslogd be a
Hurd server as well as a UDP and PF_LOCAL server. We don't want to
create a whole new logging facility.
- Re: core file writing, (continued)
- Re: core file writing, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/06
- Re: core file writing, Jon Arney, 2002/03/06
- Re: core file writing, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/06
- Re: core file writing, Jon Arney, 2002/03/06
- Re: core file writing, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/06
- Re: core file writing, Jon Arney, 2002/03/09
- Re: core file writing, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/10
- Re: core file writing, Jon Arney, 2002/03/12
- Re: core file writing, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/13
- Re: core file writing, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/11
- Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic),
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/03
Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic), Moritz Schulte, 2002/03/02
Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic), Adam Olsen, 2002/03/03
Re: Hurd logging. (was zalloc panic), Niels Möller, 2002/03/03