[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run.c translator
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: run.c translator |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:22:22 -0500 (EST) |
> You ought to set some flag somewhere so that you get the PIPE_BUF
> behaviour for pipes, but *not* for socketpairs, right?
The PIPE_BUF behavior is part of AF_LOCAL sockets.
- run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/21
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/21
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20