[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make check
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: make check |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:06:55 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 07:52:08AM -0800, James Morrison wrote:
> I'm curious what types of checks would be in a make check target
> for the hurd. Would have to be run in a sub-hurd to test all the
> hurd translators and libc functions? Should the test programs be
> compiled within that test sub-hurd?
You could probably do most of the testing without running in a
subhurd. It seems to me that make check spawning a subhurd might
introduce too many unknowns.
I'm supposed to look into cunit for Mailutils. But the idea behind
cppunit and junit, is that you inherit the object and apply a testing
framework to that. That way you can test interfaces and such at the
unit level.
We're just getting into it - subscribe to bug-mailutils if you want to
watch (or help) with out successes and failures.
--
Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
- hendridm