[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:08:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:54:42AM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> And even if you hack all the header files, there's still inlined versions
> from things compiled for GNU/Linux one day when we have binary compatibility.
I doubt if binary compatibility with GNU/Linux is a good thing to
have. It looks like we are then bound to the ABI and can't change it
if we want to keep compatibility. There are also other problems, for
example a program compiled on GNU/Linux could happily use PATH_MAX but
that would cause a buffer overflow on GNU/Hurd. Also programs on
GNU/Linux can use the /proc filesystem and can't on GNU/Hurd. There
are probably more issues.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects
pgpQfIAu8TKIn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, (continued)
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Neal H Walfield, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Neal H Walfield, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Neal H Walfield, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/13
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Neal H Walfield, 2002/03/23
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/24
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Neal H Walfield, 2002/03/25
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/25
- GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord),
Jeroen Dekkers <=
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Oystein Viggen, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Farid Hajji, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/25
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Oystein Viggen, 2002/03/26
- Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/26
- Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/25