[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Apr 2002 19:34:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
> It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we
> are ready to nix the pre-libio package archive.
Do you have any preferance as to when that occurs? The next glibc
upload includes '--enable-libio' and libc0.3 as the packages. Our
staging archive has ~1000 packages in it. It appears to work (massive
compiles, and uploads and downloads using ssh and apt-get) to basic
testing.
The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is failing.
I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
> > 1) Try builds with Marcus' ioperms patches. This requires
> > oskit-mach headers (which I have) but I would prefer to do it with
> > an oskit-mach-dev package. Either way, this will be tested
> > Saturday.
> Do you mean my implementation of ioperm in libc, or something else?
> I've only put that into 2.3, not 2.2 as yet.
I didn't manage to test it Saturday (the weather was too nice),
although I have emailed with the oskit package maintainer about making
sure that Jon's patch gets in there.
I would like to put a sample package of oskit-mach up somewhere for
people to play with. It seems to work well enough on my system, that
it's now my first choice in the grub menu.
I seem to remember you emailing a bit ago asking for folks to test
this for possible inclusion in glibc-2.2. I'm hoping to do that
testing (Unless someone beats me to it, which I wouldn't mind)
> > 2) Watch for the removal of the sys_errlist definition from
> > libio.h.
> It's not exactly clear what's going to happen about that, but
> hopefully the essential packages (i.e. libiberty) can get fixed
> themselves anyway.
I just caught up on the libc-alpha mail this evening. I'll try and
figure out the right fix and get it submitted in time for the gcc-3.1
release.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
"Frankly, trying to turn Windows into a decent educational software
development platform is about as fun as jumping naked into a pit of
rabid wolves."
- As seen on slashdot
- libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/04
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Roland McGrath, 2002/04/07
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success,
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08