[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent checkins
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: Recent checkins |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2002 15:06:03 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:02:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> MiG interfaces must be the *SAME* bit widths on all platforms. That
> is, a MiG integer_t is 32 bits and must be 32 bits on *every*
> architecture.
Are we free to consider renaming these types to their C99 equivalents?
(like uint32_t and others from stdint.h)
--
One of the great things about books is sometimes
there are some fantastic pictures.
-- George W. Bush
- Recent checkins, James Morrison, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Simon Law, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Jeff Bailey, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Joachim Nilsson, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins,
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Neal H Walfield, 2002/05/08