[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ntp
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: ntp |
Date: |
11 Aug 2002 12:55:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Things like adjtime ought to use some mach syscalls. /dev/kmem doesn't
> make sense, as that's a (very low level) interface to the unix kernel,
> and the Hurd doesn't have one.
Just a brief note. It's true that we shouldn't use /dev/kmem for this
purpose--that is, I totally agree with Niels in his message.
But I want to point out that /dev/kmem is already accessible because
you can read and write pages of the kernel task with vm_read and
vm_write. It might even be a good idea someday to have someone write
/dev/kmem and /dev/mem devices.
- ntp, James Morrison, 2002/08/09
- Re: ntp, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/09
- Re: ntp, James Morrison, 2002/08/09
- Re: ntp, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/09
- Re: ntp, James Morrison, 2002/08/09
- Re: ntp, Niels Möller, 2002/08/11
- Re: ntp,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: ntp, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/11