[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug found (in libc)
From: |
Niels Möller |
Subject: |
Re: bug found (in libc) |
Date: |
27 Apr 2003 10:37:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Roland McGrath <roland@gnu.org> writes:
> I don't know why you think there is a bug, but we don't plan to change the
> sockaddr format any time soon. sa_len is not a bug.
Do you plan on changing the definition on GNU/Linux, then? To me, it
seems obvious that using different definitions of struct sockaddr on
linux and hurd will make it impossible to run a socket application
binary on the hurd, if it's compiled for GNU/Linux, and vice versa.
Or have we dropped the plans for binary compatibility between
GNU/Linux and the hurd (when running on the same cpu)?
Regards,
/Niels
- bug found (in libc), Robert Millan, 2003/04/26
- Re: bug found (in libc), Niels Möller, 2003/04/26
- Re: bug found (in libc), Robert Millan, 2003/04/26
- Re: bug found (in libc), Roland McGrath, 2003/04/26
- Re: bug found (in libc),
Niels Möller <=
- Re: bug found (in libc), Robert Millan, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Niels Möller, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Robert Millan, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Wolfgang Jaehrling, 2003/04/28
- Re: bug found (in libc), Roland McGrath, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Robert Millan, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Niels Möller, 2003/04/27
- Re: bug found (in libc), Roland McGrath, 2003/04/27
- Re: Bug#187391: bug found (in libc), GOTO Masanori, 2003/04/28
- sa_len (Was Re: Bug#187391: bug found (in libc)), Niels Möller, 2003/04/28