|
From: | Ognyan Kulev |
Subject: | Re: A Hurd release |
Date: | Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:22:21 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041124 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 |
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Buggy software gives bad impression and I think we should at least mark the bad things. All software is buggy, and we aren't talking about a 1.0 release, just 0.3 anyway. So I don't think this is a problem.
It's mostly psychological problem. If someone is Hurd newbie and (s)he tries to use fakeroot for building Debian packages, what do you think that (s)he'll think about the Hurd? I think that such bad experience can be greatly softened by, e.g., a top-level file BUGS that lists major user-visible known bugs. We are not releasing 0.3 for ourselves, we are releasing for getting attention to us.
Regards, ogi
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |