[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: console translator set without encoding
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: console translator set without encoding |
Date: |
21 Jan 2005 21:50:37 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Marcus Brinkmann <marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> Oh, sure. The insanity starts if you talk about using "UTF-8" for
> things like filenames without being very exact in what you mean by
> that. The implications of putting the complex system UTF-8 into a
> POSIX-like operating systems as they exist today are not well
> understood, and the resulting lose ends, conflicts, etc are not
> resolved as of today.
I agree that it's tough, and I agree 100% with your assessment of the
difficulty. I'm just saying that I don't think it's insane; it's what
you have to do to support the actual complexity of the world.
Thomas
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/22
- Re: console translator set without encoding,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/22
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Samuel Thibault, 2005/01/23
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/23
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marco Gerards, 2005/01/23
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/23
Re: console translator set without encoding, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/22
Re: console translator set without encoding, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek, 2005/01/23