[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:14:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:17:18PM +0300, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> >If running unstable, the package automake was just uploaded, which
> >contains version 1.10.
> >
>
> I don't see it here
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=automake&searchon=names&subword=1&version=unstable&release=all
Those web pages are usually outdated by a day or two, use
http://packages.qa.debian.org/<source-package> for more uptodate
information.
Michael
- transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Guillem Jover, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach,
Michael Banck <=
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach), Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/27
- Re: Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach), Samuel Thibault, 2006/10/27