[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach)
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:50:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:29:26PM +0300, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
> I would like to add an observation of mine regarding the new build
> system.
>
> It seems to generate *a lot* more warning messages than the
> previous one.
Nice. It worked. Quoting `Makefile.am':
#v+
[...]
# Yes, this makes the eyes hurt. But perhaps someone will finally take care of
# all that scruffy Mach code... Also see <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?5726>.
AM_CFLAGS += \
-Wall
[...]
#v-
So, in case someone is bored... However, I think it's not worth fixing
the warnings from the files below `linux/'.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Guillem Jover, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Michael Banck, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach),
Thomas Schwinge <=
- Re: Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach), Samuel Thibault, 2006/10/27