[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1
|
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:43:54 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:51:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Barry deFreese, le Sat 28 Oct 2006 20:48:17 -0400, a écrit :
> > The %p one is even a bit of a question. I believe %p is correct but
> > I also dropped the 0x and maybe I shouldn't have?
>
> You shouldn't indeed. Some tools may depend on being able to parse
> this.
The glibc version of printf automatically adds 0x (for non-zero values)
when using %p. (i.e. it is equivalent to %#x.) Stesie's version doesn't
seem to follow that, if I'm reading the code correctly... An issue that
should be fixed, IMHO.
-antrik-