[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %gs:0x14
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: %gs:0x14 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:12:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Using `-fstack-protector' with GCC 4.1 made it include assembler code
> using ``%gs:0x14'' even with `-ffreestanding'. However, this isn't the
> correct thing to do on a) GNU/Hurd user space and neither b) in kernel
> space (with `-ffreestanding').
The GCC specific parts are now being discussed at
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29838>.
Roland, what about the glibc parts?
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: %gs:0x14, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Samuel Thibault, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Neill Miller, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Samuel Thibault, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Neill Miller, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Samuel Thibault, 2006/11/14
- Re: %gs:0x14, Neill Miller, 2006/11/14
Re: %gs:0x14,
Thomas Schwinge <=
Re: %gs:0x14, Roland McGrath, 2006/11/22