[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 6
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 6 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:43:47 -0800 |
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:55 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> >
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Are you saying I should wrap those includes
> around an #ifdef MACH_KDB up where the other includes are? If so, that
> makes sense to me.
I did not check whether the MACH_KDB check is right. But on the
assumption that it is, yes, it still belongs up above. I think the very
next file after this one in your patch was an example of it done right.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part