Re: Copyright information

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hello!

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:56:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> What would be the benefit?  Mach sources already don't have any complete
> paperwork trail for their authorship and ownership.  No GNU person working
> on Mach has ever particularly wanted to claim new control over the sources,
> or to further constrain their license terms.

Okay, I know and that's fair, but shouldn't we nevertheless then state
that somehow in the files?  How are the copyright conditions of changes
that GNU people installed?  They sure aren't ``Copyright (c) 1994-1988
Carnegie Mellon University.  Copyright (c) 1993,1994 The University of
Utah and the Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL).  All rights reserved.''


Regards,
 Thomas

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature