[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[task #6614] `sync' vs. `syncfs'
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
[task #6614] `sync' vs. `syncfs' |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:17:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.2 (Ubuntu-feisty) |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?6614>
Summary: `sync' vs. `syncfs'
Project: The GNU Hurd
Submitted by: tschwinge
Submitted on: Saturday 03/10/07 at 19:17
Category: The GNU Hurd
Should Start On: Saturday 03/10/07 at 00:00
Should be Finished on: Saturday 03/10/07 at 00:00
Priority: 1 - Later
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Planned Release: None
Effort: 0.00
Wiki-like text discussion box:
_______________________________________________________
Details:
On a Hurd system we currently have both `sync' (from GNU coreutils) and
`syncfs' (from GNU Hurd), whereas the former provides only a subset of the
fuctionality of the latter.
In my opinion, they should be merged, having `syncfs' be absorbed into
coreutils's `sync'.
This, of course, needs to be discussed with <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?6614>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [task #6614] `sync' vs. `syncfs',
Thomas Schwinge <=