Re: Server overriding; chroot

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net dies 19/03/2008 hora 17:04:
> The problem is that passive translators are started by the parent
> filesystem server to which they are attached, not by the process
> accessing the node; thus they get a "normal", non-chrooted port, and
> consequently have access to the whole filesystem tree.

The problem here is that authority is given instead of demonstrated. No
translator should receive a port from a priviledged server like the
parent FS server.

Would it be possible to somehow store a port or serialization thereof
when setting up a passive translator?

Curiously,
Pierre
-- 
nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature