[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS help needed, top and htop
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: CVS help needed, top and htop |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:45:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 15 Aug 2008 02:26:29 +0200, a écrit :
> > 2. In the file proc/version.c, the procps determines the version of
> > Linux kernel to which the /proc belongs to and as I suppose it changes
> > the way it reads the fields from /proc files vary. But on Hurd this
> > version is returned as 0.3.0 which is in no way valid for procps. As
> > of now I have Hard Coded it to 2.6.18, since the procfs I have written
> > in most compatible with that version of Linux. So how do you suggest I
> > patch it? Atleast here we need to differentiate between Hurd's version
> > of procps and Linux's version of procps. How do I do it?
>
> I don't understand. What is the problem if you just have procfs return
> 2.6.18?
The problem is that he didn't notice that there was a debian kfreebsd
patch that makes procps use the value from /proc. The original code use
uname.
Samuel