[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Mach: in user-mode?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Mach: in user-mode? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:49:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Ivan Shmakov, le Fri 05 Jun 2009 22:26:46 +0700, a écrit :
> >>>>> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >>>> * The time and qualification necessary to deploy one or more
> >>>> GNU/Linux systems on a single host using User-Mode Linux is (to my
> >>>> experience) significantly lower than for the other solutions (KVM,
> >>>> Xen)
>
> >>> For Xen I agree. For KVM, I don't. Building a UML image is not
> >>> particularly easier than building a KVM image.
>
> >> I've implied using rootstrap to build an image.
>
> > And you can use debootstrap to build a debian image. There is no
> > fundamental difference here.
>
> There is: debootstrap only runs privileged.
Gah, damn silly OSes that don't permit mounting images as
non-priviledged user :)
> > Oh, I thought it was given to any user.
>
> There's the `kvm' group in Debian GNU/Linux.
Yes, I've seen that, but I meant that I had completely forgotten that I
had added myself to it long time ago.
> > So they still fear security breaches...
>
> A completely bug-free version of Linux is yet to be released.
Sure, but they still allow anybody to open a TCP/IP socket by default.
> With the latter being said, I wonder, wouldn't the changes
> necessary to run GNU Mach in user-mode be similar to those
> already done to make it suitable for Xen?
The thing is: Xen provides you with pagetable-like operations so it's
quite easy to do it. Linux doesn't provide you with that and so you'll
have to reimplement memory management tricks.
Samuel
Re: GNU Mach: in user-mode?, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/06/16