[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to git
|
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Moving to git |
|
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:31:09 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's commit
> > messages
> > +are valid.
>
> Is it really *after*, or starting with?...
>
> A less ambiguous wording would be preferable :-)
Yes, I'm myself not entirely happy with the wording.
e227 is the last CVS commit. So indeed *after* that one the pure Git
ones begin. (Obviously we can't know the SHA1 of the commit
to-be-created, so we can't use that one as ``starting with''.) Or is
there some flaw in my logic?
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature