[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Transparent Unionmount
|
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Transparent Unionmount |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:04:08 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Another topic for discussion was whether a non-transparent unionmount
> should shut down the mountee on going away.
Actually, what I was discussing is whether non-transparent unionmount
should go away when the mountee goes away.
The question you are putting forward here is much easier to answer:
> I believe such functionality is necessary, because it is unionmount
> who starts the mountee, so it bears some responsibility for its child
> process.
Yes.
-antrik-