[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 23:00:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:59:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:21:59AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > It *might* be useful to union-mount the bootstrap filesystem -- I'm
> > just not sure whether it's even possible in theory :-)
>
> I think I must ask the question which has been around my mind for some
> time: what is a ``bootstrap filesystem''? Is it a filesystem used at
> Hurd startup (like ext2fs)?
Yes.
> If so, unionmount could be used with a bootstrap filesystem in the
> case of LiveCDs, for instance.
Exactly.
> > > * fsys_forward: in the previous discussion there is a short
> > > explanation why this RPC should be left implemented in the default
> > > version (returning EOPNOTSUPP);
> >
> > Well, if it can be easily forwarded, we should -- it *might* be
> > useful...
>
> Unfourtunately, as it has already been discussed on the IRC, I failed
> to overload netfs_S_fsys_* stubs by simple redifinition of the
> corresponding functions.
I must admit that I don't remember what the problem was there...
-antrik-