[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unionfs Documentation
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: unionfs Documentation |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:37:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi Gianluca,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:27AM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> Hm, funny things happens while grepping past mail.
Hehe... Nice to see you here :-)
> > This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations
> > probably spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best. I
> > entreated Gianluca to check what over implementations do, instead of
> > trying to reinvent the wheel -- but he wouldn't listen :-(
>
> Olaf. When would have this happened?
I can't say exactly. But I distincly remember that you discussed the
semantics of file deletion in unionfs on IRC with some others. Various
ideas were thrown around, problems pointed out -- it was obvious that
this is really a complex topic hard to figure out.
And it appeared to me that every implementation of unionfs must face the
very same problems. So I suggested checking how others have solved it --
surely the popular implementations in Linux etc. have spent a lot of
thought on that, and the conclusions shouldn't be any different for
us...
I hope the way I wrote this above wasn't offensive -- I see now that it
might be :-(
-antrik-