[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:25:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 01 Oct 2009 17:00:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > Attached is a patch I've found in my xen checkout, I can't remember
> > whether it works.
>
> Unfortunately not. I rebooted blubber with a kernel containing this
> patch; see the attached log file.
Please also see xm dmesg, where the precise IP where the kernel crashed
should be (maybe only with debug options), and then you can addr2line
it.
Samuel
- Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/13
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/14